Publication Ethics
To uphold the highest standards of validity, integrity, transparency, and fairness in scientific publishing, Jurnal Ilmu Komputer dan Informasi (JIKI) adopts its publication ethics by referencing several established guidelines, including the COPE International standards for editors and authors, Ethical guidelines for peer reviewers, and Elsevier Publishing Ethics.
These principles are adjusted to suit the characteristics of JIKI’s focus areas—computer science and information systems—and to serve the interests of its key stakeholders: authors, reviewers, editors, and readers. JIKI’s publication ethics consist of the following three main sections:
Publication Ethics for Authors
Publication Ethics for Reviewers
Publication Ethics for Editors
1. Publication Ethics for Authors
1.1 Reporting Standards and Data Accessibility
- Authors must present their research findings accurately, objectively, and transparently.
- All data and analyses must be represented truthfully and without manipulation.
- Manuscripts must include sufficient detail and references to allow replication and future improvement.
- Editors may request access to raw data for verification during the review process.
1.2 Originality, Source Acknowledgment, and Confidentiality
Submissions must be entirely original and free from any form of plagiarism. Authors must properly acknowledge the work of others by citing all relevant publications that have influenced the study. Confidential communications, such as personal correspondence or discussions with third parties, must only be disclosed with explicit permission.
1.3 Multiple, Redundant, or Concurrent Publication
Submitting or publishing the same work in more than one journal is strictly prohibited. Previously published work may only be reused in limited contexts, such as theses, lectures, or preprints.
1.4 Authorship and Contributions
Authorship is limited to individuals who have made a significant contribution to the work. All contributions should be specified according to the CRediT (Contributor Roles Taxonomy). The corresponding author must ensure that all co-authors have approved the final manuscript before submission. Individuals who contributed to the work in specific aspects but do not meet authorship criteria should be acknowledged appropriately.
1.5 Hazards and Research Involving Humans or Animals
Any use of materials, procedures, or equipment posing potential hazards must be clearly identified. Ethical standards vary depending on the type of research:
- Public or Secondary Data: A statement confirming data accessibility must be included.
- Human Interaction (Survey/Interview/Questionnaire): Authors must confirm that informed consent was obtained. Written consent is required when personal data or case details are disclosed.
- Experimental Studies (Human/Animal Treatment): Ethical approval from an Institutional Review Board (IRB) or equivalent body must be obtained and stated.
- Research involving animals is rare in JIKI, but when applicable, IRB approval and a safety statement are mandatory.
1.6 Competing Interests
Authors must disclose any financial or personal relationships that may influence the research outcomes, or explicitly declare the absence of such conflicts.
1.7 Correction of Errors
If authors discover significant errors in their published work, they must promptly inform the editor to issue a correction or retraction. If editors identify errors through external parties, authors are obliged to cooperate fully in resolving the issue.
1.8 Image Integrity
Minor adjustments that improve image clarity are permitted. Manipulation that distorts or misrepresents data is prohibited.
2. Publication Ethics for Reviewers
2.1 Role in Editorial Decision-Making
Peer review is an essential element of scholarly communication and supports editors in making publication decisions while improving the quality of manuscripts. Reviewers should conduct reviews respectfully, objectively, and in accordance with proper reviewing etiquette. If reviewers feel unqualified or unable to complete the review in time, they must inform the editor immediately.
2.2 Confidentiality
All manuscripts under review are confidential documents and may not be shared with others without editorial approval. Reviewers must not use unpublished materials for their own research without explicit written consent from the authors. Any co-reviewing or consultation with colleagues must first be approved by the editor to ensure proper credit and confidentiality.
2.3 Ethical Awareness
Reviewers should remain vigilant for potential ethical issues in manuscripts and report them to the editor if detected.
2.4 Objectivity and Conflict of Interest
Reviews must be objective and supported by clear arguments. Personal criticism of authors is inappropriate. Reviewers must disclose any conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships with the authors or institutions involved. Suggestions for citations to the reviewer’s own work must be scientifically justified, not self-serving.
3. Publication Ethics for Editors
3.1 Editorial Decision-Making
Editors are fully responsible for deciding which manuscripts are suitable for publication, guided by the paper’s quality, originality, and relevance. Decisions must also comply with legal standards regarding defamation, copyright, and plagiarism.
3.2 Peer Review Management
Editors must ensure a fair, unbiased, and timely review process, engaging at least two qualified reviewers per manuscript. Editors must avoid fraudulent or unqualified reviewers and carefully assess potential conflicts of interest.
3.3 Fair Evaluation
Manuscripts should be evaluated solely on scholarly merit, regardless of authors’ personal characteristics or affiliations. Editors must ensure transparency and clear communication with both authors and reviewers through the journal’s official submission system.
3.4 Journal Metrics and Integrity
Editors must not manipulate citation metrics or require authors to cite specific works solely to boost journal rankings. Citations should only be requested when academically justified.
3.5 Confidentiality
Editors must protect the confidentiality of all submissions and communications with reviewers. Reviewer identities must remain anonymous unless agreed otherwise. Editors must not use unpublished materials for their own research without written permission from the authors.
3.6 Conflict of Interest
Editors must not handle manuscripts in which they have personal, professional, or financial involvement. Such submissions must undergo an independent peer-review process, separate from the editor’s influence.
3.7 Maintaining the Scholarly Record
Editors must work with publishers to investigate allegations of research or publication misconduct to preserve the credibility of the journal. Tools such as Turnitin or similar plagiarism detectors must be used to prevent unethical practices.
Upon confirmation of misconduct, editors should issue appropriate actions—such as corrections, retractions, or expressions of concern—promptly and transparently.
